Dashboard   >   Annual APTA Sustainability Metrics
[2022 ARCHIVE] Yellow leaf icon Metro Sustainability

Annual APTA Sustainability Metrics

APTA Sustainability Indicators
2022-2023 Performance Trends

KEY:
Favorable: An icon indicating unfavorable
Unfavorable: An icon indicating unfavorable
APTA category
2022 2023 % change progress
Operational Efficiency
Unlinked Passenger Trips(per Capita x 100)
2,596
2,765
6.5%
An icon indicating favorable
Vehicle Miles Traveled(per Capita)
7,112
7,281
2.4%
An icon indicating not favorable
Operating Expenses1(Dollars per Vehicle Revenue Mile)
$18.80
$20.07
6.8%
An icon indicating not favorable
Vehicle Revenue Miles(1,000,000)
99
109
10.9%
An icon indicating favorable
Air Quality
Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions2(Pounds per 10,000 Vehicle Revenue Miles)
7.1
6.1
-14.3%
An icon indicating favorable
Climate
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3(Pounds CO2e per Vehicle Revenue Mile)
3.40
2.89
-15.1%
An icon indicating favorable
Greenhouse Gas Displacement(Metric Tons CO2e)
-468,135
-496,491
6.1%
An icon indicating favorable
Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions(Metric Tons CO2e)
-315,686
-352,954
11.8%
An icon indicating favorable
Energy
Energy Use(1,000 British Thermal Units per Vehicle Revenue Mile)
51.6
51.5
-0.2%
An icon indicating favorable
Water
Water Use(Gallons per Vehicle Revenue Mile)
1.81
1.64
-9.4%
An icon indicating favorable
Waste
Total Solid Waste4(Tons per 100,000 Vehicle Revenue Miles)
11.11
11.70
5.3%
An icon indicating unfavorable
Diversion from Landfill(Percent Diverted)
44.0%
44.6%
1.4%
An icon indicating favorable
Notes:

1United States Dollars (USD) in this table are normalized to be presented in 2023 USD.

2Criteria air pollutant (CAP) emissions are a normalized aggregate of hydrocarbon (HC), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) emissions.

3In 2020, Metro updated its GHG emissions calculation methodology to calculate Scope 2 emissions using both market-based and location-based emission factors. The former reflects the emissions intensity of purchased electricity from utilities based on the sources from which they procure energy, and the latter reflects the average emissions intensity of the regional grid on which our energy consumption occurs. In this table, emissions totals are based on market-based emissions factors.

4Waste metrics in this table only reflect solid waste generated and diverted from operations, not from construction.

Overview

As a founding member of the American Public Transportation Association's (APTA) Sustainability Commitment, Metro reports annually on a framework of performance metrics that enable transit agencies to measure and report sustainability performance over time. LA Metro was a founding signatory of the APTA Sustainability Commitment program in 2009 and has since achieved Platinum-level recognition - the highest level of achievement - for significant reductions in areas such as energy, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions. Metro is the first public transportation agency in North America to receive Platinum level recognition.

Under the APTA Sustainability Commitment, Metro reports annually on a framework of twelve sustainability performance metrics. The APTA guidance recommends that transit agencies use normalization factors when reporting these metrics to measure and compare sustainability performance over time, especially during years of service growth or change.

Metro uses Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM) as its primary normalization factor. VRM represents the total number of miles Metro vehicles travel during revenue service (i.e., the time when a vehicle is available to the public and is expected to carry passengers). Using this factor enables an annual evaluation of the efficiency of Metro's operations relative to the amount of service being provided. The reporting framework and methodology that govern these metrics conform to APTA's Recommended Practice "Quantifying and Reporting Transit Sustainability Metrics."

The APTA Sustainability Commitment and associated methodology are currently under review by APTA. Metro will review the applicability of the new methodology once released and will adapt how we report these metrics in all subsequent reports.

Overview

As a founding member of the American Public Transportation Association's (APTA) Sustainability Commitment, Metro reports annually on a framework of performance metrics that enable transit agencies to measure and report sustainability performance over time. LA Metro was a founding signatory of the APTA Sustainability Commitment program in 2009 and has since achieved Platinum-level recognition - the highest level of achievement - for significant reductions in areas such as energy, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions. Metro is the first public transportation agency in North America to receive Platinum level recognition.

Under the APTA Sustainability Commitment, Metro reports annually on a framework of twelve sustainability performance metrics. The APTA guidance recommends that transit agencies use normalization factors when reporting these metrics to measure and compare sustainability performance over time, especially during years of service growth or change.

Metro uses Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM) as its primary normalization factor. VRM represents the total number of miles Metro vehicles travel during revenue service (i.e., the time when a vehicle is available to the public and is expected to carry passengers). Using this factor enables an annual evaluation of the efficiency of Metro's operations relative to the amount of service being provided. The reporting framework and methodology that govern these metrics conform to APTA's Recommended Practice "Quantifying and Reporting Transit Sustainability Metrics."

The APTA Sustainability Commitment and associated methodology are currently under review by APTA. Metro will review the applicability of the new methodology once released and will adapt how we report these metrics in all subsequent reports.

APTA Sustainability Indicators
2022-2023 Performance Trends

KEY:
Favorable: An icon indicating unfavorable
Unfavorable: An icon indicating unfavorable
APTA category
2022 2023 % change progress
Operational Efficiency
Unlinked Passenger Trips(per Capita x 100)
2,596
2,765
6.5%
An icon indicating favorable
Vehicle Miles Traveled(per Capita)
7,112
7,281
2.4%
An icon indicating not favorable
Operating Expenses1(Dollars per Vehicle Revenue Mile)
$18.80
$20.07
6.8%
An icon indicating not favorable
Vehicle Revenue Miles(1,000,000)
99
109
10.9%
An icon indicating favorable
Air Quality
Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions2(Pounds per 10,000 Vehicle Revenue Miles)
7.1
6.1
-14.3%
An icon indicating favorable
Climate
Greenhouse Gas Emissions3(Pounds CO2e per Vehicle Revenue Mile)
3.40
2.89
-15.1%
An icon indicating favorable
Greenhouse Gas Displacement(Metric Tons CO2e)
-468,135
-496,491
6.1%
An icon indicating favorable
Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions(Metric Tons CO2e)
-315,686
-352,954
11.8%
An icon indicating favorable
Energy
Energy Use(1,000 British Thermal Units per Vehicle Revenue Mile)
51.6
51.5
-0.2%
An icon indicating favorable
Water
Water Use(Gallons per Vehicle Revenue Mile)
1.81
1.64
-9.4%
An icon indicating favorable
Waste
Total Solid Waste4(Tons per 100,000 Vehicle Revenue Miles)
11.11
11.70
5.3%
An icon indicating unfavorable
Diversion from Landfill(Percent Diverted)
44.0%
44.6%
1.4%
An icon indicating favorable
Notes:

1United States Dollars (USD) in this table are normalized to be presented in 2023 USD.

2Criteria air pollutant (CAP) emissions are a normalized aggregate of hydrocarbon (HC), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate matter (PM) emissions.

3In 2020, Metro updated its GHG emissions calculation methodology to calculate Scope 2 emissions using both market-based and location-based emission factors. The former reflects the emissions intensity of purchased electricity from utilities based on the sources from which they procure energy, and the latter reflects the average emissions intensity of the regional grid on which our energy consumption occurs. In this table, emissions totals are based on market-based emissions factors.

4Waste metrics in this table only reflect solid waste generated and diverted from operations, not from construction.